What comes after Mobile Marketing 2.0? Mobile Marketing 2.0g.
We are moving towards the next phase in mobile-based marketing? Some people call this Mobile Marketing 2.0:
“…combines business and customer interaction data to automate the delivery of relevant marketing information.”
So what’s the next phase after MM 2.0? For some folks, the answer seems to be MM 2.0g — or get the government involved:
“We’re filing a complaint to force the FTC to take a proactive stance,” Chester said. Mobile ad companies “incorporate the same problematic business practices that we witnessed with PC-based broadband marketing, including behavioral targeting and profiling techniques–except that this time they know your location,” he said.
Jeff Chester is founder and executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.
Too much government involvement? Others deciding what is best for you or me? You decide. But in my opinion, the government is the LAST thing you get involved. Let the market/industry develop, and settle all by itself. Let those who abuse the trust of their customer just crash-and-burn, or just go sue their asses. But keep the government out; their involvement minimal.
See Groups Complain To FTC About Mobile Marketing.
Update: FTC Warns Mobile Marketers to Keep it Honest (Wireless Week).
ceo
Dark Green
Wordpress
Ash Haque
XHTML Strict
In light of the complaints filed with the Federal Trade Commission on 6th May by the Center for Digital Democracy and the US Public Interest Research Group, we at SmartReply wish to express our support of both advocacy groups in their effort to safeguard Americans’ privacy rights in the realm of mobile marketing. As a leading provider of mobile marketing services to many of the nation’s leading retailers and brands, we have unwaveringly advocated for respectful and unintrusive mobile communications. As mobile technology continues to evolve, it will be vital for companies and oversight entities like the FTC to work in conjunction, to preserve the privacy of ordinary citizens.
We agree with Mr. Chester’s assertion that the FTC must take a proactive stance to stave off dubiously ethical practices, particularly as mobile marketing represents a highly personal method of reaching target audiences. We acknowledge, however, that this personalized communication is the very aspect of the medium that makes it so effective from a marketing standpoint. We might also point out that the goal of regulation should not be to squelch all marketing or advertising messaging, but rather to ensure that it is consistently welcome and invited, and that it provides value and service to consumers.
As such, we support the current FTC opt-in requirement for mobile messaging, and would support any initiatives that build on that policy. People should be required to opt-in to mobile programs, but we believe the opt-in process should remain simple (a yes text from a consumer) so as not to place undue burden on either the company or the consumer. Since the technology will continue to mature and expand, it doesn’t make sense that a consumer would have to first opt-in to get a text message, then opt-in to share their personally identifiable information, then opt-in to share location-based data, then opt-in to use commerce features, etc. Of equal if not greater importance, the ability to opt-out should also be swift, complete and painless.
If the FTC applies its current standards – the opt-in requirements in particular - to emerging segments of the mobile market (including campaigns that capitalize on location awareness), we believe that mobile marketing will continue to be a welcome, effective and potentially rewarding avenue of communication between consumers and the companies that serve them.
Eric Holmen, President
SmartReply Inc, Irvine, CA
Hi, Eric. As you know there already are guidelines and other defined. For texting, opt-in is already required.
By adding laws, before giving the opportunity to really explore the space, you already are by default liming the space/opportunity/potential.
Opt-in is the right thing to do, and no laws are needed for that. I am sure you support opt-in; so do I. The ones that don’t opt-in, or abuse trust, let the market take care of them; they won’t last.
I think you and me are agreeing for the most part, except I believe government involvement should not be the first step to take, but the last… I believe the government is there to support, not to run how mobile marketing should be…
Cheers,
ceo