<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: Citigroup developing branded NFC phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Mobile Software, Development &#38; Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ceo</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-5669</link>
		<dc:creator>ceo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/#comment-5669</guid>
		<description>Ah... yes, because the trend is that people will be shifting their use towards that little device, the cellphone. You can search the web, communicate and share, and do secure mobile transactions.

Why they are doing their own? Because the network providers here in the US are *not* ordering the phones from the phone manufacturers, and are delaying adoption; all they do are trials and more trials. But the benefits are well understood already; time to go to market.

ceo
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; yes, because the trend is that people will be shifting their use towards that little device, the cellphone. You can search the web, communicate and share, and do secure mobile transactions.</p>
<p>Why they are doing their own? Because the network providers here in the US are *not* ordering the phones from the phone manufacturers, and are delaying adoption; all they do are trials and more trials. But the benefits are well understood already; time to go to market.</p>
<p>ceo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raddedas</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-5668</link>
		<dc:creator>raddedas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2008/04/04/rumor-citigroup-developing-branded-nfc-phone/#comment-5668</guid>
		<description>why would they develop their own phone, and thus compete with mobile operators, when they could just put NFC payments on a card like eg. Oyster+Barclaycard?

i guess you can in theory do more, but how much more does a bank need to do than enable payments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would they develop their own phone, and thus compete with mobile operators, when they could just put NFC payments on a card like eg. Oyster+Barclaycard?</p>
<p>i guess you can in theory do more, but how much more does a bank need to do than enable payments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
