<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event; it is not about the OS, and other things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Mobile Software, Development &#38; Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:47:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of the Mobilists #96 &#124; VoIP News</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of the Mobilists #96 &#124; VoIP News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of the Mobilists #96 &#124; VoIP News</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of the Mobilists #96 &#124; VoIP News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile 2.0 Wrapup &#124; VoIP News</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile 2.0 Wrapup &#124; VoIP News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>[...] complaints why Windows Mobile was not used or not even mentioned during the event&#8230; Read Enrique C. Ortiz on spot reply to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complaints why Windows Mobile was not used or not even mentioned during the event&#8230; Read Enrique C. Ortiz on spot reply to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kerr</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kerr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>2 points;
Yes, they should have mentioned other operating systems etc. - it gives the distinct impression that the US mobile community has gone all starry eyed over the iPhone, which actually has a miniscule user base compared to other platforms, and is technically inferior to just about any Nokia smartphone for example.

Secondly, the general consensus in the mobile industry, and amongst users, is that Windows Mobile is, to put it bluntly, crap. Like other Microsoft products, it is bloated, a resource hog, badly designed, buggy and with security holes. Now that Microsoft doesn&#039;t (thank God) have a monopoly on the next generation of &quot;personal computers&quot; (mobile phones), their market share and success will start to reflect the quality of their products - which means I don&#039;t hold out much hope for their successful future...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 points;<br />
Yes, they should have mentioned other operating systems etc. &#8211; it gives the distinct impression that the US mobile community has gone all starry eyed over the iPhone, which actually has a miniscule user base compared to other platforms, and is technically inferior to just about any Nokia smartphone for example.</p>
<p>Secondly, the general consensus in the mobile industry, and amongst users, is that Windows Mobile is, to put it bluntly, crap. Like other Microsoft products, it is bloated, a resource hog, badly designed, buggy and with security holes. Now that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t (thank God) have a monopoly on the next generation of &#8220;personal computers&#8221; (mobile phones), their market share and success will start to reflect the quality of their products &#8211; which means I don&#8217;t hold out much hope for their successful future&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of the Mobilists #96 at mTrends - mobile media lifestyle trends - m-trends.org</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of the Mobilists #96 at mTrends - mobile media lifestyle trends - m-trends.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C. Enrique Ortiz &#8220;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event&#8221; reply on a previous rant from Rob Tiffany. More of these lively discussions and divergent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile 2.0 Wrapup at mTrends - mobile media lifestyle trends - m-trends.org</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile 2.0 Wrapup at mTrends - mobile media lifestyle trends - m-trends.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>[...] complaints why Windows Mobile was not used or not even mentioned during the event&#8230; Read Enrique C. Ortiz on spot reply to that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complaints why Windows Mobile was not used or not even mentioned during the event&#8230; Read Enrique C. Ortiz on spot reply to that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tester</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event, why is that, and ...&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you see the post at weblog.cenriqueortiz.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No mention of Windows Mobile @ Mobile 2.0 Event, why is that, and &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Did you see the post at weblog.cenriqueortiz.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile 2.0 Wrapup</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/comment-page-1/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowehl: This is Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mobile 2.0 Wrapup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/10/17/no-mention-of-windows-mobile-mobile-20-event-why-is-that-and-other-things/#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>[...] Tiffany posted about the lack of mentions of WinMo and CEO sums up why that is: focus shifting from platforms to applications. I think it&#8217;s cute that Rob thinks the reason there was no mention of WinMo is because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tiffany posted about the lack of mentions of WinMo and CEO sums up why that is: focus shifting from platforms to applications. I think it&#8217;s cute that Rob thinks the reason there was no mention of WinMo is because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
