<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Requirement #1 for Mobile 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Mobile Software, Development &#38; Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:43:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bray on Flat Rate Considered Harmful &#124; &#8230;about mobility - the mobility weblog</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bray on Flat Rate Considered Harmful &#124; &#8230;about mobility - the mobility weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting that Tim writes about flat rates being considered harmful&#8230; Just last week I wrote that flat rates are the Requirement #1 for Mobile 2.0. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Interesting that Tim writes about flat rates being considered harmful&#8230; Just last week I wrote that flat rates are the Requirement #1 for Mobile 2.0. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mobile Web Tablet &#187; The #1 priority for &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; and why Mobile is Personal</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mobile Web Tablet &#187; The #1 priority for &#8220;Mobile 2.0&#8243; and why Mobile is Personal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>[...] Enrique Ortiz got it right. The same was true for fixed internet. Remember when you had to dial in to get a connection? And it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enrique Ortiz got it right. The same was true for fixed internet. Remember when you had to dial in to get a connection? And it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceo</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>ceo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Maybe, maybe not. It is the chicken and the egg problem. Compelling-enough applications are connected ones. To promote usage, flat-fee is key.

ceo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, maybe not. It is the chicken and the egg problem. Compelling-enough applications are connected ones. To promote usage, flat-fee is key.</p>
<p>ceo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine of MMM/Brighthand</title>
		<link>http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine of MMM/Brighthand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.cenriqueortiz.com/mobility/2007/09/17/requirement-1-for-mobile-20/#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>I disagree. What is needed is a compelling enough service/app/product that will drive more than just niche consumers to use the mobile web. When that happens, flat fee plans become just a means to keep that revenue stream coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. What is needed is a compelling enough service/app/product that will drive more than just niche consumers to use the mobile web. When that happens, flat fee plans become just a means to keep that revenue stream coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
